I am fairly positive you have consumed plenty of pieces regarding Green Belt Architects And Designers. They are decidedly fashionable with bloggers and readers alike.

For architects that specialise in the green belt, sustainability is not an architectural trend, it’s the heart of their business. They employ a conscious approach to energy and ecological conservation in designing every space,for future generations. Green Belt policy has been part of the planning system for some 74 years. The essential characteristics of Green Belts are their openness and permanence. According to the 2019 National Planning Policy Framework, the Green Belt serves five purposes: to inhibit ‘urban sprawl’, to prevent neighbouring towns merging into one another, to preserve the countryside from encroachment, to preserve the setting and special character of historic towns, and to assist in urban regeneration, by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land. Many green belt architects are devoted to creating exemplary places, not just for today, but for generations to come. They believe in architecture that connects the material, emotional and intellectual needs of people with their physical world. There is a tendency to see all open or green field land and particularly that on the edge of towns as Green Belt: it isn’t. Some also believe the Green Belt and its ‘inviolability’ as a matter of law: it isn’t. A desire to create an effect hits at the root of the role of detailing. Architects make choices of which things are seen and which are not, what is exaggerated and what is played down based on what effect they are trying to achieve. Creating a particular atmosphere, mood or emotional response is in the end the point of architecture, the intent that raises it above mere building. The choices required to achieve the desired effect may well run contrary to concepts such as honesty or allegiance of form and function.



Green belt architects can be involved in master planning, and deep whole house retrofits to high quality extensions. Their common theme is the aim to minimise the environmental impact of buildings, whilst offering meaningful value and long term beauty to a place and community. Whether you are a property developer looking at making a planning application, an investor assessing the optimum use to make of a property portfolio, or a lender undertaking ‘due diligence' to minimise their investment risk, green belt architects provide initial advice to maximise development potential and reduce planning risk. The Green Belt is not a legal construct; it is entirely based on planning policy and policy documents. Whilst case law has given us guidance in relation to what can and cannot be done in the Green Belt there is no statutory law of the Green Belt. Architects apply impartial and creative thinking to projects large and small. They add value, whether from maximising light and space, adding functionality, or achieving the best return on your investment. Professional assistance in relation to New Forest National Park Planning can make or break a project.

Flexible And Comprehensive Approach

‘Green Belt’ is a powerful brand name that garners broad support, often without a deep understanding of its role and function. Some developments may be permitted in the green belt. These include where necessary for the purpose of agriculture including farm diversification, horticulture, woodland and forestry and countryside recreation. Acceptance of the principle of a use or development does not mean that planning permission will always be granted. Although Green Belt is not being eroded at an alarming rate, it is being lost, and the rate of loss is increasing. National planning policy has facilitated this through subtle changes in policy guidelines. When determining planning applications, substantial weight should be given to any harm to the Green Belt and ‘inappropriate development’ should be approved only in ‘very special circumstances’. Not all development, however, is inappropriate. The NPPF sets out that specific types of development, such as small residential extensions and the replacement of buildings, are not inappropriate provided they meet a number of conditions. By making it a priority to purchase steel, lumber, concrete, and finishing materials, such as carpet and furnishings, from companies that use environmentally responsible manufacturing techniques or recycled materials, green belt architects up the ante on sustainability. Designing around Architect London can give you the edge that you're looking for.

Development in the green belt should respect the rural character of the area. In order to protect its setting, existing landscape features should be protected and the impact of obtrusive ‘suburban clutter’ associated with the development such as roads, lamp posts, pavements, car parks, and boundary features should be minimised. For example, the use of hedging and traditional hard landscaping materials is encouraged. We must do all we can to protect and enhance green belt land in a way that benefits as many people as possible. People need both good affordable housing and access to nature. If we use land well we can do both. The UK’s pattern of piecemeal review through Local Plans (driven by increasingly onerous housing targets) is not strategic and is patently unable to make rational decisions on the future shape of the city. Green belt architects are aware that a building project can often seem like a complex endeavour, however, they pride themselves in becoming familiar with their clients’ needs, guiding them through each stage of the design, planning and development processes. Obtaining planning consent in the Green Belt is rarely straightforward but it can be done. Your application will involve a sensitive approach to the Green Belt setting, high architectural value and an understanding of what it is that the local planning authority values and is trying to protect. Formulating opinions on matters such as GreenBelt Land can be a time consuming process.

A Green Future

Green belt architects are experienced at working on both large and small projects and within larger development consultancy teams. They make constructive suggestions where they can, either to council planners or to the applicants and their professional advisers. Green Belt land faces many challenges. It is expected to meet diverse and often conflicting needs, and attracts considerable scrutiny due to the planning controls which govern it and the urban pressures which it faces. In order to retain the open appearance of the Green Belt, it is important to prevent replacement dwellings being materially larger than the original dwelling. In addition, the Local Planning Authority is concerned not to prolong the existence of isolated and prominent housing development which may be counter to the objectives of sustainability in its demands for improved servicing. Building on the green belt is one of the most divisive issues in UK planning law and paragraph 136 of the NPPF is clear that: “Green belt boundaries should only be altered where exceptional circumstances are fully evidenced and justified.” Green belts do not prevent pylons or telecommunication masts, though local communities can object to the design or location of the latter. Green belts do not prevent pieces of countryside being purchased by developers in the expectation that one day they will get planning permission and thereby increase in value. Such land is often left untidy in the hope that unsightliness will increase the likelihood of planning permission. Thanks to justification and design-led proposals featuring Net Zero Architect the quirks of Green Belt planning stipulations can be managed effectively.

Does the Green Belt, as a planning designation, support sustainability by encouraging urban regeneration and concentration of homes, services and employment opportunities; or does it prevent sufficient homes being built, encourage ‘cramming’ of new housing into large urban areas and artificially inflate prices leading to unaffordable housing and leapfrog development beyond the Green Belt boundaries? Traditional architecture will need to transform itself into a sustainable branch. At the same time, institutions need to change laws and regulations to enable this kind of design and construction. Many of England’s Green Belts cross over several local authority boundaries or are in areas covered by two tiers of local government. In two tier areas there is often a division of responsibilities between a local planning authority (a district or borough council) and a county council that has responsibilities for or resources relating to farm holdings, public rights of way and landscape. A wider, strategic approach to managing the Green Belt can be helpful in such areas. Paragraph 85 of the NPPF states that local planning authorities should, where necessary, designate Safeguarded Land. Safeguarded Land is land between built up areas and the Green Belt that is protected from development in the short to medium term in order to meet development needs beyond the plan period. It is land which is inappropriate to retain in the Green Belt but which is not needed or appropriate for development at the present time. There are 14 separate Green Belts varying in size from London (Metropolitan) at 486,000 hectares to Burton-upon-Trent and Swadlincote at just 700 hectares. In total, they cover just over 1.6 million ha or nearly 13% of the land area of England. Within the 14 Green Belts there are 38 major towns and cities with populations of over 100,000 and in total around 30 million people or 60% of the population live in the towns and cities surrounded by the Green Belt. Maximising potential for Green Belt Planning Loopholes isn't the same as meeting client requirements and expectations.

Limits To Growth

As long as you approach it in the correct way, with an experienced architect, you can usually get permission to make reasonably sized additions to your house, or to replace it with something suitably larger on Green Belt land. Many planning consultants and architects shy away from land or proposals in the Green Belt. Some of them though have comprehensive experience and understanding of dealing with proposals in the Green Belt. When considering any planning application, local planning authorities should ensure that substantial weight is given to any harm to the green belt.Very special circumstances’ will not exist unless the potential harm to the green belt by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm resulting from the proposal, is clearly outweighed by other considerations. Check out further particulars about Green Belt Architects And Designers on this House of Commons Library link.

Related Articles:

More Findings On Green Belt Planning Loopholes
More Information On Green Belt Architectural Practices
Additional Findings On Green Belt Architectural Consultants
More Background Findings On Architectural Designers
Additional Findings With Regard To Architects Specialising In The Green Belt
Additional Insight About Green Belt Architectural Designers
More Background Insight About Green Belt Architectural Practices